The Gavelyte, November 1910

1, 1 I Ir- (I\ E ,) 11•' \ll /TH!., Y P \ PEI ~ 1111 r. it '" , 1111111 l, l1dl M11t1t•r, In tlw I' 1 I 11111<', 11 I 11hr lllo•,llhln, It 1111111 'Ill, l\H~I \ 11 ,•orr, p,•11d,•111·, hould h,• 1ul1lr,·~·1·il " lh, l,A\tl \ T "-olll,·, on . \lnln 1.. 1·,..i~r· 0 ,111,•. Ohio In a r · nt issu• of the R. P. Witn<· R app ar d an article h ad d, "What i , 11.., rlp11 ,11 R:11,•, ... 1wr y,•11r.-. lnl(lt• <'11plt·~ I ' darvillc oil gc." Th• an w •r wa-1 1 11 ,· "A thoroly 'hristian in t1tution." Th· -- I GAVE:LYTE wi sh s to add just a word to ),'.))l'l'Ol(l. J. ~T \I!•. th t th t' 1 th t b f a wor y ar 1c a may o llt \\ 111 ,1ou1, , 'I'.! i,;,lltor in <'hi f interest to very alumnus, stud nt, ROl:\FR'l' \\ U, Tl('h., 'll, .\~s,wlnl1• Editor . . . ,, i,: tn·u, ro. 11 m, ·ia. Lltl'rnry Editor fn nd or read r. It I a d light to say u.JWRT\ nn:. \\ 1<:LL .·10, Alumni Eilltor not only that hristian principl s ar t· t.010-:. t'J<: \\'ILLl\~l.'o1'. ·111 · ocl1>tf . taught, not only the Faculty are IH.Rl'fl .\ -.101010 'T, 'll. I 1'.dlrnr-1. . . 1 REil L l'J F\l..\. . , 1. 1. \ thlNI<· f:<11tor Chnst1~n men and women, but more- " IU~J;:1,~11..~ )/l~'!LH. l:!. 1 . . . ·~ I EVERY student of edarville lleg is ,, R.,< 1'. MOR Io.. 1.1. . L •till htl,to, a profess d follower of hri t Would 11 ERTH \ .\ '.'. })EHSO:S. 1:i. I ' Fl,\\ 0 011 1· HO\\ I.LL . ·1:i. Humo r 1<:,li1nr. that every college in the land might be B 1_ i,::,is . 1'..\ n, able to gi v the same grand report. ,. 1> n1xo.·, ·12 B11,- t: \RL \ll•('l,~:LL.\ '\, 'J:l. " ER." nn J'(),''[}:H.'l:l. I ~ RJ,'.I} L. ( LJ;::'ll.\ .. ·1a. I t ' H.\S E YOHO '1:1, :'ll~r. 1111'1 'l' n'MHll'l'r --o - The recent change of rules concern– .,,.,1. .\lh )t g-r::1. ing the credit given for literary per– :'IJailin~ C'I rk formances is undoubtedly a decided move for the better. The evident Before another issue of the GAVELYTE I intention on the part of the committees the fir t semester inter-society contest I and the faculty to raise the standard of will be a matter of history. The return I performances to the highest degree is to the old-time system of competition commendable. It means that more i not made with any feeling of re- effort will have to be put forth in order luctance but with pleasure. The form- I that the required number of perfor– er system of "points" awarded for mances be given during each semester. each performance and the method of There seems to be a prevailing opinion choosing the winner proved a decided among the student body, however, that incentive to QUANTITY much to the dis- the rules rega1ding debate make too paragement of QUALITY. Not that much distinction between the winner quality was entirely lacking, for it was and the loser, and the grounds for such not, only neglected. But the coming I opinion are well grounded. Too often