12 • The Language of Organizational Communication Channels 2025 li tasn guus aa gg ee wa tittiht ui nd et sh eoi rf wo rograknei rzsa t ti oo nw?a rI nd tghoins —s t eu sdpye, cI i faol luyn da tbhbartepv ri aotf ieosns si o—n iasl j aarn- eg susaegnet. iIaal l stoy pf oeu nodf t hoar tg tahniisz pa trioofneas ls i ol anna -l jparrogsopne ci st i av ve osi tduedde ni nt sc oa nn dv etrhseaitri of anms iwl i iet sh, w“ c ho iml emout hn ei try ”s p eacni adl i z e“ de xtpeer rmi esn—c es ”u—c ha ar es uveserbdaflrsequaenndtly.pAitdchditiolenvaelllsy, thoef nothne- addi fmf e irsesni ot n sg uceosutns .s eAl ol rosn ga r ewai tdha ppt er do f ef osr- sional jargon, computer-mediated ci mo mp omr tuanni tc attyi op ne s a on fd osrmg aa nl l i zt aa ltki o anrael al al sno- gs mu aagl le twa likt hi inn pt ah ri st i ac ud lma ri sissi oa ncso on ft fri icbeu. tTi nh ge fwa hc ti oc hr tios tchoenas di dme irsesdi otnos bo ef f iccoe m’ s fcourlttaubr lee, ao nr gda mn i oz taitvi ao tni an lg dc ou me tmo ut nh iec ahti igohn l eavme los nogf tsht reo tnega mc u. l Tt uhries dh ue ae l tthoyt hc ue l teuxrtee ni ss i av les oi na- smt ietmu tbi oenr sa l agduhi deer lei .n eOsvteor awl lh, i ct hhea lcl uolft ut hr ee as mn da l l our gnai vnei zr sa ittiyo naadl mliasns igounasg eo f foi cf e tahri es vc ai eswe es tdu pd oy sci at inv ebley obfyg irtesamt beemnbe ef irtst. oTthhies uwnaisv ecrosni tdyuac dt emdi sassi own se lol f af isc emi na nwy hoi ct hh eirt owrograknpi zl aact ei o lnesa dbeyr s porno vhi od wi n gt o i an ps ipgrhota ct ho ob regaabnliez at ot i ounsael t hl aenfgi nu da gi neg. sLoefa tdheirsss tmu da yy tcou l ct ur er east et hsrt rooungghe trhaeni rdahpeparlot ahci ehr t ow ot hr ke language of organizational language. Limitations Tr ehsi es asrtcuhd yd ews iagsnp, rt hi me ai rmi lpy l el immei tnetda tbi oy nt hoef dp aa trat i ccioplal encttsi.oMn ,yadnedc itshieo ns atmo pulsee smi zue l toi -f pv al er ime teyt hoof dqsu oa lf i tdaattiav ec odlal et ac t bi ount yaileslod el idma- ictoeldl e ct ht eed af mr oomu neta cohf md aettah otdh adtuceotuol dt i mb ee cpouns swt raasi netsss. eCnot li lael cbt iuntgddi faf itcau fl ot rb et hc ae ucsoer -I cmoaunl dy ni notte rc aocl ltei oc nt sa uddui eo toor pt er ixvt adc ay t ac oonn- ci netrenrsa. cMt i oynasu dbieot wa ne de nt e txht ec oal ldemc tiisosni oonns ct oo upnr sees leonrtsa tai no nd s gauneds tps hwo ne er ec ar lel ss t. rIi cwt eads nd uo tr ianbgl et ht oe acuhde icok -rienc oprrdo ct eh ses c oo ur ndsuerl oi nr gs pd er invtast ea nmde et ht ienigrs fwa mi t hi l i epsr.o sSpoemc et i voef stthue- ab ul ed di ou ed at ot a t ht he aqt uI adl ii tdy caonl lde cp to ws i at iso nu innugs oa -f mr oyo mm i cwr oi tphh oonbes tirnu ct ht ieo ncse.n tAedr doift iao nl aarl lgye, twhoi sr ks tgurdoyu pf oactuas eudn iovne ras i tsymianl lt hs ep eMc iifdi c- wo regsatne irzna t i oUnna li t el adn g uSatgaet e so, f t hainsd g r otuhpe cgoaunlidzabtieonvse. ryAdsiffearencat sferomstuodthye, r tohre- giteende. ralizability of my findings is limFuture Studies Ft i uo tnuarl e l asnt ug ud ai egse mu saeyd l wo ohke na ti not regr aa nc ti iznag- wt i oi tnhs . iTnhdei v vi daur ay li sn goduet sgirdeee soifn oartgt iatnuidzeas- tmo uwnaircda ttiho ins ct oy pu el dobf eo er gx ap nl oi zr ea dt i of unratlhceormi n- more interviews. These studies could
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTM4ODY=