The Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Creationism (2018)
Our findings were unexpected and contrary to conclusions that have been published in the literature about the Coconino beginning with McKee’s seminal paper in 1934. The Coconino is purported to have well-sorted and well-rounded sand grains, steep cross-bed dips at the angle of repose, mechanically frosted sand grains, no mica grains, wind-ripple laminae, mud cracks at its base, raindrop prints, and vertebrate and invertebrate trackways that were made in rather dry conditions. After a widespread study of dozens of outcrops and hundreds of thin sections we found the Coconino sand is only moderately sorted and subangular to subrounded, has cross-bed dips averaging about 20°, has chemically frosted sand grains, muscovite in almost every thin section, no clear wind-ripple laminae, sand injectites at its base, features that only resemble raindrop craters in mud (not in sand) and trackways that are better explained with an underwater origin. Additionally we found that the formation contains extensive dolomite (in the form of beds, ooids, cement, clasts and rhombs), widespread parting lineation, parabolic recumbent folds, angular K-feldspar grains, interfingers with other marine formations, lacks narrow avalanche tongues (found in eolian dunes) and many other features unexpected if this were an eolian deposit. Although there is more study that can certainly be completed, we believe the evidence that the Coconino is a subaqueous deposit is substantial and will be difficult for our critics to explain in any other way. There are no modern analogs that match the precise sedimentology of the Coconino, but we believe that subaqueous sand waves may be a start in the right direction to understand how the Coconino was deposited. Instead of the Coconino being a problem for creationists, it can be one of our most powerful arguments in support of the biblical account of the Flood. There are many other similar cross-bedded sandstones in the western United States and around the world; the Coconino may be the key to unlocking their origin as well. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: We would like to thank Cedarville University and Biblical Creation Trust for allowing us to invest so much of our time in studying the Coconino and related sandstones, and the Institute for Creation Research for their generous financial support of this multi-year project. We are also hugely indebted to our friends Ray Strom of Calgary Rock and Materials Services Inc. and Guy Forsythe of Crying Rocks Ministry, with whom we have spent many happy hours in the field. Thanks are also due to Stephen Cheung for processing many of the samples we collected and to several of John Whitmore’s students for contributing to the project in significant ways, notably Sarah Maithel who has continued to study the Coconino since graduating from Cedarville. REFERENCES Abbott, L., and T. Cook. 2004. Hiking the Grand Canyon’s Geology . Seattle, Washington: Mountaineers Books. Ahlbrandt, T.S. 1979. Textural parameters of eolian deposits. In A Study of Global Sand Seas , ed. E.D. McKee, pp. 21-51. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1052. Ahlbrandt, T.S., and S.G. Fryberger. 1980. Eolian deposits in the Nebraska Sand Hills. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1120A:1-24. Alf, R.M. 1968. A spider trackway from the Coconino Formation, Seligman, Arizona. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences 67:125-128. Aliotta, S., and G.M.E. Perillo. 1987. A sand wave field in the entrance to Bahia Blanca Estuary, Argentina. Marine Geology 76:1-14. Allen, J.R.L. 1970a. The avalanching of granular solids on dune and similar slopes. The Journal of Geology 78:326-351. Allen, J.R.L. 1970b. Physical Processes of Sedimentation . New York: American Elsevier Publishing Company, Inc. Allen, J.R.L. 1980. Sand waves: A model of origin and internal structure. Sedimentary Geology 26:281-328. Allen, J.R.L. 1984. Parallel lamination developed from upper-stage plane beds: a model based on the larger coherent structures of the turbulent boundary layer. Sedimentary Geology 39:227-242. Allen, J.R.L. 1985. Principles of Physical Sedimentology . London: George Allen & Unwin Publishers Ltd. Allen, J.R.L. and J. Narayan. 1964. Cross-stratified units, some with silt bands, in the Folkestone Beds (Lower Greensand) of southeast England. Geologie en Mijnbouw 43:451-461. Anderson, C.J., A. Struble, and J.H. Whitmore. 2017. Abrasion resistance of muscovite in aeolian and subaqueous transport experiments. Aeolian Research 24:33-37. Arvidson, R.S., and F.T. Mackenzie. 1999. The dolomite problem; control of precipitation kinetics by temperature and saturation state. American Journal of Science 299:257-288. Baars, D.L. 1961. Permian blanket sandstones of Colorado Plateau. In Geometry of Sandstone Bodies , eds. J.A. Peterson, and J.C. Osmond, pp. 179-207. Tulsa, Oklahoma: American Association of Petroleum Geologists. Baird, D. 1952. Revision of the Pennsylvanian and Permian footprints Limnopus, Allopus, and Baropus. Journal of Paleontology 26:832-840. Baltz, R.M. 1982. Geology of the Arica Mountains [MS Thesis]. San Diego: San Diego State University. Basma, A.A., A.S. Al-Homoud, A.I.H. Malkawi, and M.A. Al-Bashabsheh. 1996. Swelling-shrinkage behavior of natural expansive clays. Applied Clay Science 11:211–227. Beard, L.S., R.E. Anderson, D.L. Block, R.G. Bohannon, R.J. Brady, S.B. Castor, E.M. Duebendorfer, J.E. Faulds, T.J. Felger, K.A. Howard, M.A. Kuntz, and V.S. Williams. 2007. Preliminary geologic map of the Lake Mead 30’ x 60’ Quadrangle, Clark County, Nevada and Mohave County, Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2007-1010 [map and pamphlet]. Berné, S., J. Durand, and O. Weber. 1991. Architecture of modern subtidal dunes (sand waves), Bay of Bourgneuf, France. In The Three- Dimensional Facies Architecture of Terrigenous Clastic Sediments and its Implications for Hydrocarbon Discovery and Recovery , eds. A.D. Miall, and N. Tyler, pp. 245-260. Tulsa, Oklahoma: SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology). Concepts in Sedimentology and Paleontology, volume 3. Berné, S., J.-P. Auffret, and P. Walker. 1988. Internal structure of subtidal sandwaves revealed by high-resolution seismic reflection. Sedimentology 35:5-20. Besio, G., P. Blondeaux, M. Brocchini, S.J.M.H. Hulscher, D. Idier, M.A.F. Knaapen, A.A. Németh, P. Roos, and G. Vittori. 2008a. The morphodynamics of sand waves: A model overview. Coastal Engineering 55:657-670. Besio, G., P. Blondeaux, V. Van Lancker, E. Verfaillie, and G. Vittori. 2008b. Sand waves characteristics: Theoretical predictions versus field data. In River, Coastal and Estuarine Morphodynamics: RCEM Whitmore and Garner ◀ The Coconino Sandstone ▶ 2018 ICC 621
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTM4ODY=