er, P. Schmid, L.R Backwell, G.A Belyanin, P. Boshoff, K.L. Hunter, E.M Feuerriegel, A. Gurtov, J. Du G. Harrison, R. Hunter, A. Kruger, H. Morris, T.V. Makhubela, B. Peixotto, and S. Tucker. 2010. Geological and taphonomic context for the new hominin species Homo naledi from the Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa. eLife 4:e09561. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.09561. Grine, F.E. 2019. The alpha taxonomy of Australopithecus at Sterkfontein: The postcranial evidence. Comptes Rendus Palevol 18:335–352. DOI: 10.1016/j.crpv.2019.01.004. Groening, F., G-C. Weniger, and J.F. Kegler. 2007. The digital world of Neanderthals - NESPOS, an online archive for Neanderthal research. Archaologisches Korrespondenzblatt 37, no. 3:321–333. Habermehl, A. 2010. Baraminological analysis places Homo habilis, Homo rudolfensis, and Australopithecus sediba in the human holobaramin: discussion. Answers Research Journal 3:155–156. Haile-Selassie, Y., B.M. Latimer, M. Alene, A.L. Deino, L. Gibert, S.M. Melillo, B.Z. Saylor, G.R. Scott, and C.O. Lovejoy. 2010. An early Australopithecus afarensis postcranium from Woranso-Mille, Ethiopia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107:12121–12126. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1004527107. Hartwig-Scherer, S. 1998. Apes or ancestors? Interpretations of the hominid fossil record within evolutionary and basic type biology. In W.A. Dembski (editor), Mere Creation, pp. 212–235. Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press. Kivell, T.L., J.M. Kibii, S.E. Churchill, P. Schmid, and L.R. Berger. 2011. Australopithecus sediba hand demonstrates mosaic evolution of locomotor and manipulative abilities. Science 333:1411–1417. DOI: 10.1126/ science.1202625. Lordkipanidze, D., T. Jashashvili, A. Vekua, M.S. Ponce De León, C.P.E. Zollikofer, G.P. Rightmire, H. Pontzer, R. Ferring, O. Oms, M. Tappen, M. Bukhsianidze, J. Agusti, R. Kahlke, G. Kiladze, B. Martinez-Navarro, A. Mouskhelishvili, M. Nioradze, and L. Rook. 2007. Postcranial evidence from early Homo from Dmanisi, Georgia. Nature 449:305–310. DOI: 10.1038/nature06134. Lubenow, M.L. 2004. Bones of Contention: A Creationist Assessment of Human Fossils, revised ed. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books. Marchi, D., C.S. Walker, P. Wei, T.W. Holliday, S.E. Churchill, L.R. Berger, and J.M. DeSilva. 2017. The thigh and leg of Homo naledi. Journal of Human Evolution 104:174–204. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.09.005. Menton, D.N. 2010. Baraminological analysis places Homo habilis, Homo rudolfensis, and Australopithecus sediba in the human holobaramin: discussion. Answers Research Journal 3:153–155. O’Micks, J. 2016. Homo naledi probably not part of the human holobaramin based on baraminic re-analysis including postcranial evidence. Answers Research Journal 9:263–272. O’Micks, J. 2017a. Rebuttal to “Reply to O’Micks concerning the geology and taphonomy of the Homo naledi site” and “Identifying humans in the fossil record: A further response to O’Micks.” Answers Research Journal 10:63–70. O’Micks, J. 2017b. Further evidence that Homo naledi is not a member of the human holobaramin based on measurements of vertebrae and ribs. Answers Research Journal 10:103–113. Pugh, K.D. 2022. Phylogenetic analysis of Middle-Late Miocene apes. Journal of Human Evolution 165:103140. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2021.103140. Reeves, C.R. 2021a. A critical evaluation of statistical baraminology: Part 1—Statistical principles. Answers Research Journal 14:261–269. Reeves, C.R. 2021b. A critical evaluation of statistical baraminology: Part 2—Alternatives and conceptual and practical issues. Answers Research Journal 14:271–282. Ross, M. R., P.S. Brummel, and T.C. Wood. 2023. Human history from Adam to Abraham: Integrating paleoanthropology with a young-age creation perspective In J.H. Whitmore (editor), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Creationism, pp. 66-87. Cedarville, Ohio: Cedarville University International Conference on Creationism. Rupe, C., and J. Sanford. 2017. Contested Bones. Canandaigua, New York: FMS Publications. Sanders, R., and K.P. Wise. 2003. The cognitum: a perception-dependent concept needed in baraminology. In R.L. Ivey, Jr. (editor), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Creationism, pp. 445–456. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Creation Science Fellowship. Senter, P. 2010. Were australopithecines ape-human intermediates or just apes? A test of both hypotheses using the “Lucy” skeleton. The American Biology Teacher 72, no. 2:70–76. DOI: 10.1525/abt.2010.72.2.4. Sinclair, P., and T.C. Wood. 2021. Revising hominin baraminology with medoid partitioning and fuzzy analysis. Answers Research Journal 14:451–462. Wise, K.P. 2005. The Flores skeleton and human baraminology. Occasional Papers of the BSG 6:1–13. Wood, T.C. 2010. Baraminological analysis places Homo habilis, Homo rudolfensis, and Australopithecus sediba in the human holobaramin. Answers Research Journal 3:71–90. Wood, T.C. 2013. Australopithecus sediba, statistical baraminology, and challenges to identifying the human holobaramin. In M. Horstemeyer (editor), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Creationism, article 16. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Creation Science Fellowship. Wood, T.C. 2016. An evaluation of Homo naledi and “early” Homo from a young-age creationist perspective. Journal of Creation Theology and Science Series B: Life Sciences 6:14–30. Wood, T.C. 2017. Identifying humans in the fossil record: A further response to O’Micks. Answers Research Journal 10:57–62. Wood, T. 2020. An expanded character set for evaluating the phylogenetic position of Homo floresiensis. In S.R. Leigh (editor), Program of the 89th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists April 15–18, 2020, p. 312. Los Angeles: American Association of Physical Anthropologists. Wood, T.C. 2021. Baraminology by cluster analysis: A response to Reeves. Answers Research Journal 14:283–302. Wood, T.C., and P.S. Brummel. 2023. Postcranial characters for analyzing hominin relationships and adaptations. Retrieved April 28, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.tb2rbp05f. THE AUTHORS Todd Charles Wood is a researcher, teacher, and lecturer with twenty years’ experience working in young-age creationism. He is especially known for his studies of created kinds and fossil hominins. He is currently president of Core Academy of Science and resides in Dayton, Tennessee, home of the Scopes Trial. PS Brummel is a student and hominin fossil aficionado. He was awarded the 2022 Sanders Scholarship from Core Academy of Science. He currently resides in Indiana. WOOD AND BRUMMEL Hominin Baraminology Reconsidered 2023 ICC 266
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTM4ODY=