Torch, Fall/Winter 2009

Fall–Winter 2009 | TORCH 17 generation than naturalism is. And it strengthens the creationist position that functionally complete life forms were created in the beginning by the One who is “the life.” Mind Matters The human mind — the essence of our identity — results from the special creation of mankind as described in the Genesis account. Being made in the image of God distinguishes mankind from animals, and the mind is a primary aspect of that distinction. Although animals respond to their environment, demonstrate learning, and exhibit personality, their use of language and ability to conceptualize abstract concepts pale in comparison to that of human beings. Science has made great strides in correlating physical structures and chemical processes to animal and human intelligence, yet naturalistic models explain the difference as merely the number and quality of neural connections. The perception of “you” is considered an illusion brought about by complex biochemical reactions. Responding to such a cold view of existence, transcendentalists resort to concepts like atman — the self — which is a part of the universal essence of mind. In the End The real question when comparing origin theories is, “To whom are we responsible?” In naturalism, physical law and chance drive humankind. Although people may appear autonomous, they are ultimately destined to follow their genes and environment and, therefore, not accountable. In transcendentalism, people are not constrained solely by the physical world but directed by karma or other metaphysical principles. These principles are a law unto themselves and determine the trajectory of one’s life and afterlife. The biblical account declares there is a God and He sent a Redeemer to whom we are accountable. Many of the Athenians responded to Paul’s remarks with sneers, but some wanted to know more. Others believed and followed. We, too, must decide what we believe about our origins, as it will determine what we believe about God. T Dr. Steve Gollmer serves as professor of physics at Cedarville University. He earned an M.S. in physics from the University of Illinois and a Ph.D. in atmospheric science from Purdue University. His research interests include climate modeling and systems biology. He has taught at Cedarville since 1994. TOP: ZOOMSTUDIO; INSET: ARIEL RENAE