Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  25 / 36 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 25 / 36 Next Page
Page Background

Musical Offerings

2016

Volume 7

Number 2

73

that are quite long and thin in comparison. The noteheads of Typography

II are less peaked and more rounded, and their size is small enough to fit

in the staff without overlapping the staff lines.

25

Figure 3: Typography II

26

Whether or not Petrucci did his own punchcutting is uncertain, but

Attaingnant almost certainly, at least for a time (perhaps early in his

career), engraved his own type. A peculiar dispute led to a court case

between Pierre Simon Fournier le Jeune and a family known as the

Ballards, who had held a two-hundred-year-old monopoly on music

printing despite their remarkably outdated technology. The resulting

court documents name “atteignant” as the inventor of the “large chant

note carrying its staff,” meaning the individual pieces of type carrying

both a note and its staff fragment.

27

Heartz goes into great detail of this

court case in his

Historical Study

, but the main conclusion applicable to

this discussion is that Attaingnant did indeed engrave his own type for a

time.

28

25

Daniel Heartz, “Typography and Format in Early Music Printing: With

Particular Reference to Attaingnant’s First Publications,”

Notes

23, no. 4

(1967): 703.

26

Georg Kinsky, ed.,

A History of Music in Pictures

. (New York: Dover,

1951), 95.

27

Heartz,

Royal Printer of Music

, 56.

28

Ibid., 49–56.