Vol. 8 No. 1 Grace Mowery • 47 et axbplei scht ai nt igo nI ssh mf oar eml aasnthhoeoidd etahlr. o u g h e s - BS eyl fr-eMd ae de me iMn ag ne l ae nmde ne ti gs hotfetehnet hc u- cl te on ft ut hr ye speanntdi ms Me nrt. aMl imd da nl eht oo on d’ s, rSeosut rt ah iwn eo dr t hm ae nx -- hp ou ob dl i ct os pshheorwe aan dm ea xnp sr ue cs sc ienegd ienmg oi tni otnhse, tmhaonung ehr .I sMh mo sat eilmdpooerst asnot liyn, as htee mwpi de er ends tt hh er o ur egsht rda ei nmeodnms t raant’isn gv i ehwo wo fI srheml iagei ol ’ns rheel iignihoanbiint sf ,l ueemnpc ehsa stihzei ndgi ftfheer ennete sdpfaocreas nmeowr atlei trym. Tt hh ea tt ee rnmc o mm po ba si lsee smhoirsa tl iytpy eaoc -f cSoo uunt ht sw o rf tohr a d tvhoec a t et ys pf oer i nohf e r rbeol iogki o—n tt hi oen ks i ni nd tohfempourballiict ya tnhda tt hi ne f lpurei nv ac et es . aAcs- Pt uerayr c e wy o emme pn h a seixziesst e, dn i naest e ernetlhi g- ci oeuns- as oumt heo rmi t ieens otuot sfiodreg toh et hcehiur r cmho, ar al llo wd ui nt yg (o3f 3h5i s) .mMorr.aMl i tiyd da nl edt ohni sdfoa me si ltya’ ks ea sa hg eenrcey- fml eecnt st a t itohne o fr er es tl irgaiionne dw i tmh iann t’ sh e ihmopml ee-, bl i gu itoIns hamn ade ll ettask ei ts iangf el unecnycoef hhiiss oa wc t ni o rnes-, wm ho entehye frr oams aap oc chki ledt b roeofku s( i2n3g5 -t2o3 7t )a ko er ac os uar nt r oaodmu l t ( 4d9e8f e, n5d3i n9g) . wI sohmmeane l i nt a kt he es af rgoemn cay f eomf i nh ii ns e oi nwf nl u eCnhcrei ,sat inadn hi tey a al l po awr st iatc tt ioo na sc ,t i avne dl y hpies r vf uatduer eh ips l at hnos .u gHhet sd, ohei ss nd oo tmleesatvi ce sr pe lai gc ei o, nb ut ot rhees ildeet s oint l yp liany t ahne active role in his social success. Mobile morality, then, describes a man’s active pa nu dr s ud iot moef srtei cl i gi ni of nl u, eonuctes,i dt he aot f of ce cmuirnsi ni ne the private and public spheres. In Ishmael, Southworth couples this idea of mf r oomb i l es e lmf - omraadl iet y mwe ni t ha nsde l escetnetdi mternati at sl mh oeond . tAo r me xepda wn di t hu tphoenb er es st tpraari nt se odf tmh ea sne- dwihs coosue rrseelsi,g i sohne e xpiitosnteheer sd oamcehs at irca catnedr pi negr mt heias t ense wt h ei dpeua bl lmi c aans, wS oeul lt. hBwyocrrt eha its- ni t oy t; rreamt hoevri, nsghwe oi ms ee nn caos uar ma goi nr agl amuet nh otro- elevate their morality. Conclusion Through Ishmael, Southworth diverts fbryo mc h ooot shienrg wa mr i tael resa so ft hwe opmr oatna’gs o fni ci st ti oonf ha ne r i nd oe av le lm, aannd ai nn dd oc ianl lgs s ho e, rs hree af adsehr iso nt os ek mn ouwl al teed g he i mo.f Svhaer i oduesm odni ssctor autresse s h eorf wd eoemmasnthhoe obde s tapnadr t smoaf nt hheosoedd i sacnodu r sr ee s- tsoucccreesastebuat scthiallrapcrtoetrecwtsh, ofeestlsrivaesspefocr- tcrounmt r o lo, fa n de mv aoltui oens st h eb uhto mree ms paai nc es b ui nt dWoeelst enr oat ncdo Pn ef i anrec ehyi ss hmoowr a, lf iet my at hl ee ri ne t. eAr s- vc reenat ti oe na wi not or s emsai tl ue a tf iaoi lnu raes s wcoamn e no f ut enn- cmoonrsacliloyursel yg u l at at ikneg s roecsi eptoyn as inbdi l irteym of voer mwoorrtahl ’s onbolivgealtioanrguferos mthamt emn.enSomuuthst-
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTM4ODY=